Publishing premature erroneous postmortem reports can distort public perception and derail the course of justice. The impact of a doctor issuing an erroneous postmortem report and publishing it through the media goes far beyond individual misconduct. It spreads misinformation, erodes trust in investigative agencies and institutions such as the police and judiciary, prejudices public opinion, traumatizes the victim’s family, and undermines the rule of law. Such misconduct does not merely harm one case; it corrodes public trust in medicine, law, and governance, destabilising peace and harmony in society. It also violates the sub judice rule, which restricts commentary on matters under judicial consideration, to preserve fairness and integrity. Justice is not served by following majority sentiment or public pressure. Justice is served by truth, established through evidence and impartial investigation.
Investigations require careful collection of evidence & impartial analysis. A society committed to fairness must recognise that investigators and courts serve the truth, not popularity. Their independence is not a luxury but the foundation of justice itself.
Publishing Premature erroneous Postmortem report violates professional ethics and the sub judice rule, which constitutes contempt of Court. It breaches medical ethics, which demand competence, honesty and diligence.
Related Article :
Role of Doctor as Expert Witness